Bailey Identification

The following tables provide a summary breakdown of identifying characteristics and markings of the Bodies, Frogs and Receivers, Lateral Adjustment Levers, and Lever Caps on Stanley’s Bailey line of bench planes.  Features are broken down by type.[1]  These tables provide a helpful quick reference guide for identifying type.  Please see the full Type Study and Plane Chart pages for additional information, including dates.

Stanley Bailey Plane – Identifying Characteristics

Bed Markings & Identification
Type 1-3 No Marking
Type 4 Many have a foundry number (“73”, “71”) cast into the bed behind the frog
Type 5-6 The plane model number added; smaller planes at the toe, #5 and up on the heel
Type 7 Numbers spaced further apart, ‘S’ foundry mark stamped behind frog
Type 8 B’ foundry mark behind frog
Type 9 2 patent dates behind frog: MAR-25-02, AUG-19-02, ‘Bailey’ at toe, straight frog rib
Type 10 2 patent dates behind frog, rib at frog seat is now arched
Type 11-12 3 patent dates behind frog; MAR-25-02, AUG-19-02, APR-19-10
Type 13 1 patent date behind frog: APR-19-10
Type 14 1 patent date behind frog. MADE IN U.S.A. cast at toe, raised ring for knob
Type 15 MADE IN U.S.A. behind frog, BAILEY cast behind knob
Type 16 Raised, broad, flat rib cast at toe and heel
Type 17 Heavier, thicker castings
Type 18 Return to normal castings
Type 19 Y shaped frog receiver
Type 20 Blue colored japanning
Frogs & Receivers
Receiver Frog Back Frog Adj Lateral Screws
Type 1-2 “I” Shape Round No None Round
Type 3 Vertical Round No None Round
Type 4 Flat Round No None Flat
Type 5 Flat Arched No 1 Piece Flat
Type 6-8 Flat-2 Grooves Arched No 2 Piece Flat
Type 9 Straight Rib Arched No 2 Piece Flat
Type 10-15 Arched Rib Arched Yes 2 Piece Flat
Type 16-18 Arched Rib Ogee Yes 2 Piece Flat
Type 19-20 “Y” Shape Ogee Yes 2 Piece Flat
Lateral Lever Markings
Type 5 1885-1888 One piece construction w/ 2 patent dates: 2-8-76 & 10-21-84, no Stanley mark
Type 6-7 1888-1899 Two piece with disc and 3 patent dates: 2-8-76, 10-21-84, 7-24-88
Type 8 1899-1902 One patent date: 7-24-88
Type 9+ 1902-1947 No patent dates on adjustment lever
Type 19 1948-1961 Stanley engraved vertically on lever
Lever Caps
Back Hole Logo Finish Cam Edges Notes
Type 1 Solid Keyhole None Nickel 1  3/16 Rounded Banjo Spring
Type 2 Solid Keyhole None Nickel 1  3/16 Rounded
Type 3-11 Hollow Keyhole None Nickel 1  3/16 Rounded
Type 12 Hollow Keyhole None Nickel 1  3/32 Sharper
Type 13-16 Hollow Kidney Notched Nickel 1  3/32 Sharper
Type 17-20 Hollow Kidney Notched None 1  3/32 Sharper

_________________________________

1. Smith, Roger, Patented Transitional & Metallic Planes In America, Vols. I & II, 1992

121 Responses to Bailey Identification

  1. Felix says:

    Hi I have a Stanley Bailey No 3
    Made in USA
    On the black cast there are 2 letters: 4 and U
    I do not have any other numbers on it.

    Like

    • Bryant Rice says:

      Not a lot to go on, but assuming it’s actually a Stanley and not a mixed parts plane, it’s a Type 15 or later.

      Like

  2. Matt says:

    Could Stanley have made a type 7, 4 1/2 that didn’t have an s stamped in the cast body?

    Like

  3. Matt Wallace says:

    Thanks for the reply! Could I send you some photos, in itser for you to tell me what you think?

    Thanks again!

    Matt

    Like

    • Bryant Rice says:

      Sure! Send them to vatoolworks@gmail.com.

      Like

      • Jason Eason says:

        I have a Stanley number 5 with a letter and the number 2 cast under the tote but I never seen anything about number 2 being cast under tote. Also I have a no 2 with nothing cast into the bed at all and it has a type 5 frog but the bottom is corrugated. Any significance on the no 5 and dud the no 2 come out prior to 1899 listed for larger planes with corrugated bottoms

        Like

      • Bryant says:

        There’s nothing significant about the number 2 cast under the tote. As for the #2C, those were manufactured starting in about 1898.

        Like

  4. Ed says:

    Have a Stanley Bailey #5 that appears to by a type 14 with a V cast under the tote. Any significance?
    Thanks
    Ed

    Like

    • Bryant Rice says:

      Hi Ed. I’ve seen an A down there under the tote before, but not a V. Either way, it’s a pattern number and pretty much meaningless today.

      Bryant

      Like

  5. David Roberts says:

    Was the kidney-hole lever cap introduced with Type 13, or introduced with Type 16? Thanks

    Like

  6. Joseph Aiello says:

    I have a brand new – never taken out of box Stanley Bailey 12-017 22 x 2 3/8″ plane in perfect condition. What is it worth to sell and do you have any info on how rare it is or when it was made? Guessing the 80’s..

    Like

    • Bryant Rice says:

      Joseph, I don’t have much experience with the modern Stanleys, but can tell you they are not rare and tend to be of less value than the older ones. I would think one new in the box might bring around $50 to $75 on eBay, but that’s just a guesstimate.

      Like

  7. Frank says:

    I saw 2 planes today for sell the one a Shelton i bought but the other which looked a number 5 with the most worn out blade i ever saw and it was a S. W. blade however no visual marking . my ? then did Stanley make a plane without identification.i do not understand what is meant by type as i just refer to my planes w/ the no. on them.

    Like

  8. Ross says:

    I have a 4 1/2 without a patent date on the frame . Was this common ?ro

    Like

  9. Leonid says:

    I have an unidentified #5…1918750 pat on the lever cap,NO date,stanley usa only…the tote and front knob sit on top of a casting…the front of the frog has a U stamped into it on the left hand side..Kidney shaped cap hole..and the screws that secured the knob and tote are NOT BRASS (first time i have seen it)..i dont think it has any finish because it was UNCOMMONLY rusted all over…its going into an electrical;rust removing bath (first time i am doing that)…my wild guess is a #5 type 17 1940s…the missing brass makes me think WAR YEARS….the brass depth adjusting knob also has me baffled (WAR NEED??))…..i need help..its beat to hell so i am derusting cleaning and acquiring an (proper depth adj knob) going to sharpen and p[ut it all back together and see if i have anything good..PLEASE HELP if anybody knows anything..leerussell1964@gmail.com

    Like

  10. David Roberts says:

    Hi Leonid and Bryant:

    Just a quick comment regarding Stanley wartime bench planes. I recently acquired a Stanley #5 1/2 Type 17. It has the prototypical construction details of a Stanley wartime plane, although wartime planes can contain a hodge-podge of parts. I was fortunate enough that the plane was in “new old stock” condition, which implies all original parts. Not to many wartime collectors, to my benefit, ha. I appreciate the heft of the wartime planes, and I’m a WWII buff, and a user first, collector second. On the back of the lever cap, bottom middle, between two ribs, the patent number is cast in the configuration shown below:

    PAT.
    NO.
    1918750

    A “U” is cast in the top left hand corner and “5” is cast in the top middle, just below the lever cam spring clamp. The lever cap has a kidney-shaped cap hole and the background color in the notched rectangle on front is standard Stanley orange, old but very well preserved. The tote and knob screws are of steel, and the tote toe screw is a Phillip’s head. The ogee-shaped frog has no markings, casting, etc., of any kind, and no hole, tapped or otherwise, for the frog adjusting screw. No frog adjusting screw hole is present in the bottom casting.

    I’m no expert. I can barely spell Stanley. Just wanted to chime in with some additional information regarding Stanley wartime bench planes. Hope this helps with your plane type I.D.

    Merry Holidays!

    Like

  11. Scott Keys says:

    Did Stanley make planes for other companies? I have a “Richards-Conover” plane that in most ways appears to be a #7, type 6 – 8. I’ve been unable to figure out if they copied the design, or if Stanley made it for them. Here’s a couple of pics, if that helps:

    Thanks,
    Scott

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Hi Scott. Stanley did make planes for a lot of other companies, but not for Richards-Conover as far as I know. I believe Union made the Rich-Con planes, which is more consistent with the twisted top of the lateral lever on yours.

      Like

  12. Vince says:

    Did Stanley make non Bailey no3 type 13 1925-28?

    Background: I’m looking at buying my first set of Hand planes and found this No 3 online, but it doesn’t specify Bailey or not. Also looking at a No 6 wartime plane. Seller wants 130$ (canadian) for both shipped and are in great condition.

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      I don’t believe the Four Square or Defiance planes they made were marked Bailey, but am not 100% sure. Nevertheless, $130 Canadian ($104 USD) seems very high for a #3 and #6.

      Like

  13. Mark Buongirno says:

    I have a plane that measures out to a 5 1/4 with just STANLEY in front of the knod. No other markings except STANLEY on the lateral adjustment lever.

    Like

  14. Curtis Ellison says:

    I have a Bailey plane #7 without “Stanley” stamped anywhere. It has three pat. dates. What can you tell me about this plane?

    Like

  15. Tanya says:

    I have a 608 with a patent date of Apr.2-95. I believe it’s a Bedrock? It doesn’t have flat sides, they are rounded like a Bailey.l

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Yes, you most likely have a Type 3 (1900-1908) Bed Rock. Bed Rock planes had rounded sides before about 1911.

      Like

  16. Trevor says:

    What type and year of plane is one with “U”, Made in USA, and an “8” stamped behind the frog? I also don’t get that the frog in this one is made of what looks like stamped steel, and it and the lever cap are blue.

    Like

  17. Trevor says:

    I just found an old Bailey style plane, I don’t know much about it, even if it’s a Stanley or not. But there are some markings behind the frog, which by the way, isn’t cast iron, the markings are a U, Made in USA, and an 8. Any info on the plane?

    Like

  18. Robert says:

    How rare is a Stanley/ Bailey #5 that has a brass sole and frog? I’ve never seen 1 before and seem to not even able to find any info about it. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Never say never, but I’ve never seen, heard of, or found any documentation on a brass sole and frog Stanley plane. PLEASE email me photos at vatoolworks@gmail.com. I suspect it’s either not a Stanley or perhaps some sort of user modified frankenplane. Again, would love some pics!

      Like

  19. Mark Buongirno says:

    I just saw one for sale on eBay. It is a custom made plane. Very cool but not made by Stanley.

    Like

  20. JulIan Pratt says:

    Hi…I just a bought a #3 plane. The bed and frog is painted maroon I think and the frog has no adjuster. The brass adjuster is solid rather the usual type. Any idea what this could be?

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Sounds like a 1970’s or 80’s vintage by the color.

      Like

      • Anonymous says:

        Thanks. I’m researching as much as I can right now. I don’t want to feel buyers remorse.

        Like

      • Bryant says:

        Look for the pre-WWII Stanley planes. Ideally those made from about 1910 to 1930. That was Stanley’s heyday and planes of that era are superior to just about anything you will find. Unless, of course, you want to invest in a new Lie Nielson or Veritas.

        Like

  21. Matt Williams says:

    Due to a shipping error (was supposed to receive a Stanley #5), I received a jointer plane and the only marking is No 7 on the toe versus the heel as mentioned above. It may turn out where I get the #5 mailed out to me and get to keep the No 7. So I’m just trying to figure out what I may have on my hands. Worst case scenario and it’s not a Stanley but I still have a jointer that i can fiddle with.

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Would need a lot more information to verify if Stanley or not. Check for dates behind the frog and dates and logo on the lateral adjustment lever.

      Like

  22. Mike Kirlin says:

    I have an old Bailey marked plane with no Stanley markings. It is marked #5 and there are no patent markings. It has a keyhole shaped lever cap screw hole but has a Craftsman marking. Is the Craftsman marked lever cap a replacement of the original? Can I assume this is a pre-1918 Bailey plane?

    Like

  23. Mike Kirlin says:

    Thank you for for your help Bryant. I am ordering a replacement lever cap.

    Like

  24. Paul Belcher says:

    Hello. I have an 18″ Bailey hand plane, with #6 stamped on the back end, and patent dates of March 25-02, and August 19-02. Very heavy, guessing its cast iron. Any idea what this would be worth?

    Like

  25. George Northcutt says:

    I just came across a Stanley #193 would like to Know year and value ?

    Like

  26. Levi says:

    Hi I have a bailey no. 6 with a Stanley lever cap. Is this original or is this a replacement piece

    Like

  27. Heidi Schimmel says:

    I Have a Stanley Bailey No 7 “Pat No 1918750” is marked on the back of the Frog. MADE IN USA is behind the knob and BAILEY is in front of the knob. Has anyone got any idea of its worth. All round good condition and Stanley USA Blade

    Like

  28. Heidi Schimmel says:

    Hi again, the blade adjusting nut is black plastic or possibly Bakelite…….. I’m at a loss Please help

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      Sounds like it dates from the early to mid 1940s. Value depends greatly on condition. I recommend checking recently sold #7 planes on eBay to get a good sense of what ones like yours are selling for.

      Like

  29. shane peterson says:

    Hello from Australia, I have just been given a bailey/stanley no8 23 7/8 inches long with a patent date just in front of handle saying “us pat apr 19-10 its smooth bottomed and apart from a build up of wood dust its in great condition . could you have at a guess the build date and type?

    Like

  30. shane peterson says:

    thanks for that. only other mark i could find on it is a 2 stamped under handle

    Like

  31. Steve says:

    Hi, I have two Stanley No 2 planes, both appear to be of similar vintage (early 1900s) – the castings look identical except that while one of them has ‘No 2’ cast in front of the knob, the other has no number on the casting – is this one a true Stanley or something else?

    Like

  32. Dave Hodgson says:

    I have a Stanley No. 2 type 13
    with the letter U stamped on frog..is this common ?

    Like

  33. Bruce says:

    Hi, I just purchased a bailey no.7 today and I’m a bit at a loss for type.
    BAILEY on the toe, MADE IN CAN behind the front knob, NO7 on the heel.
    STANLEY on lateral adjuster
    brass adjustment wheel
    STANLEY, MADE IN CAN on top of blade
    heavier casting
    no ridge on front edge of toe or rear edge of heel
    STANLEY on lever cap with orange background

    Type17?

    Like

  34. Bruce says:

    Hi, to add to the above post/question,
    hardwood handles, not rosewood and the lever cap is nickel plated

    Cheers

    Like

  35. Hedleypicton@gmail.com says:

    Is it possible to get replacement hardwood handles for a Bailey 5?

    Like

  36. Anonymous says:

    I have A Bailey transition plane..it has the solid brass adjustment knob with Woods Name rubbed out..it’s 9 3/8 long..No stamp on front or back on the wood base and no adjustment lever..is this Rare..very hard to find any information or pictures of the early types..would appreciate any help..thx

    Like

  37. Martijn van der Plas says:

    Hi,

    I can get my hands on a Stanley 5 1/2, but judging from the pictures I dont know whether it is a modern or vintage type.

    – Handles look to be wooden, not plastic.
    – From the rear tote, some V-shaped ribs extend to the heel of the plane, reinforcement against bending? I haven’t seen that on vintage models, but can’t seem to find out when this was first introduced.
    Most plane dating charts only consider #4’s

    Thanks in advance!
    Martijn
    The Netherlands

    Like

  38. Channon Teague. says:

    A large No.1 in casting under the rear tote??? Does anyone know what this means?

    Like

    • Cole says:

      I have a Type 9 no. 5 with this as well. Would like to know the significance of this. Mine also has a “2“ on top of the tote and a “3” on the outside of the left wall.

      Like

  39. Miguel Aguirre says:

    I purchased a low angle block plane, the blade says stanley 9 1/2 but there are no other marks except usa at the heel of the bed. I am trying to date it. Help please.

    Like

  40. Joe Lesko says:

    I just came across a stanley bailey no 5 plane with no stanley logo on lever cap. would this be original or a cap off of something else. tyia!!!

    Like

  41. Ben says:

    I ran across a stanley No. 4 at at an antique shop…I wasnt able to look too closely as I couldnt find anyone to open the case but…what i could tell…it had darker but not painted knob and tote, a pretty small adjustment nut, no. 4 IN FRONT of the knob and Bailey behind. Did not appear to have any patents anywhere. I didn’t notice if the knob was raised or not. Think it was. Was definitely NOT the flatter, wider knob though. Is there anything there to work with as far as guessing vintage? They wanted 38 bucks.

    Like

    • Ben says:

      Sorry to reply to my own comment but forgot to mention it did have “stanley” on the cap iron without any paint.

      Like

      • Bryant says:

        Best I can tell you with that info is it dates sometime between 1930 and 1961. My guess is it’s probably late 1950s based on your description of the knob and tote.

        Like

  42. Scott Irwin says:

    Tryin to find a make And model. 9-3/8” sole blue painted interior, black handles, yellow chip breaker and frog, lever cap iron no spring. “MADE IN USA” raised just behind front handle. C73 stamped on the sole directly under the frog. 2”blade

    Like

  43. Tim says:

    I have a bailey NO5 type 9 I picked up a few years ago. The patent dates are March 25-02 and Aug 19-02. Since all the time at home I am thinking of restoring it for use. I have no idea of the value. The handle is broke but has been glued and the knob has a small split. Bedsides that just a lot of surface rust and a deep cleaning should bring it back in shape. Should I restore it? If I read your information right it was made somewhere between 1092 and 1907. I don’t want to destroy a piece of history.

    Like

  44. Michael Berens says:

    Looking at a plane with no markings in the base. Suggesting a type 1-4. It does have a lateral adjustment with two patent dates suggesting a type 5. It is 2 3/8 wide and 10 inches long. Does this make it a 4 1/2?

    Is this a case of mixed and matched parts, or is it just a variance of feature combination in the 4 1/2 model that the #4 model did not have?

    Like

  45. Michael says:

    Hi, I’m looking at a #6 Stanley Bailey plane and the seller is saying it’s a Type 15, 1931 or 32. I’m having trouble verifying this with the pictures he’s sent.

    It has no patent numbers stamped on it, Bailey is stamped in front of the knob on the toe and Made in USA is in front of the frog but behind the Knob. On the adjustment lever, it has Stanley vertically. Looks like original rosewood handles. Is there differences in dating a no 6?

    Is this a type 15 #6? and is it worth the purchase?

    Thanks.

    Like

  46. ipappas says:

    Hi, I’m looking at a #6 plane. Seller is saying it’s a Type 15 but I’m having trouble verifying this with the study.

    It has no patent number.
    Toe has no raised flattened edge.
    Bailey is stamped in front of the knob on the toe.
    Made in USA is stamped in front of the Frog but behind the Knob
    Stanley stamps are verticle on the lever.
    Handles are rosewood on raised socket for the Knob.

    Is this a type 15 #6? and is it worth purchasing?

    Like

  47. Jason Easdon says:

    I saw a Stanley no. 7 today that was stamped in rear and just above the no. 7 stamp was another stamp REG. And is stamped Bailey in the front with a low knob. What does the REG mean?

    Like

  48. MARK W FARNER says:

    Hi Bryant,

    I picked up a number 5 that has “Bailey” cast in front of the knob, a ringed based for said knob, both the tote and knob are held on with screws, kidney bean lever cap, non-adjustable frog (no adjustment screw), and a steel depth adjuster knob and “Stanley” stamped on the lateral adjuster. It also seems disproportionately heavy compared to my #4’s. Is this perhaps, a “frankenplane”, or early post war production with leftover parts? The total lack of brass has me wonderi

    Like

  49. Philip G says:

    Hi Bryant,

    I have a No. 5 that I think is a Type 5, but i’m getting some conflicting markings. It’s possibly a mut! All the markings on the bed indicate it is a type 5 (no pat dates, No. 5 up front, no ring around knob). But the frog is confusing. The front edge of the frog is straight/solid with no grooves. No frog adjustment screw. It has a 2-piece lateral adjustment lever with no “stanley” or pat dates on the lateral adjustment lever. The lateral adjustment lever also looks like one solid piece that is twisted 90deg at the tip. It is not the typical lever that has the “shark fin” coming out of the bottom. It also has a little more clearance on the cutout near the pin on the adjustment lever, it is not the typical “first lateral” type 5 style that seems to hug the lever closely. Is it possible this is not a stanley? The iron has the boxed stanley stamp and nothing else, but that could have been swapped.

    Thanks!
    Philip

    Like

  50. Kenneth Manley says:

    I have a 24″ wood plane with corrugated bottom. Reading through your type identification process I thought it was a Stanley type 4. Reading further I noticed the comment about the shallow groves in the plane under the frog. Could you possibly help identify it from pictures of it. Any help would be appreciated.

    Like

  51. Jim says:

    I have a Stanley plane with original box (I don’t think it has ever been used). Base has Stanley and Made in USA cast into it. The box label reads “Plane, Type I, Class A, Stanley #9 1/2G.: The body has 9 1/2 stamped on the left side. The label also reads “F.S.N. 5110-180-0831 and GS-OOS-86709. Any idea the age and value? Thanks.

    Like

  52. Charles H Morgan says:

    I have a Winchester W 5 1/2 plane with a corrugated sole which has Winchester on the blade. On the inset face of the frog is the letter B. No other numbers or markings are found.
    Trying to nail down the age and value for a friend. Does the B stand for Bailey or Bedrock?
    Comments and suggestions please.

    Like

  53. Gareth says:

    Hey I have a Stanley it says no4 maybe 1/4 can’t read completely and looks similar to a type 17 but also has made in the usa stamped on the front between no and 4 can’t find this in any the photos I’ve seen of any of these planes is this unusual?

    Like

  54. I have a Stanley Bailey number 4, plane. It is 9.25″ long, and I believe it is a smoothing plane. It has a patent number of:
    1918750.
    Can you tell me anything about it like age, etc.?
    Thank you

    Like

  55. Mark Holibaugh says:

    I have a corrugated plane with a no. 5 on toe and no other markings, what year is that and is it a stanley?

    Like

    • Bryant says:

      No way to know from this limited information, Stanley marked their planes with just the model number from about 1885 to 1902, but the number 5 was usually marked at the heel.

      Like

  56. Morten says:

    Hi mate. Found a Stanley 41/2 with made in the U.S.A on the front of the plane (in front of the knob) it doesn’t have any patent dates. Would come across as a type 15 but never sent the made in U.S.A on the front. Has Bailey behind the knob and No on left of knob and 41/2 on right of knob. Any idea if this is a type 15 or earlier plane?

    Like

  57. Rob coviak says:

    I have a Stanley Bailey #5. There is a patent number 1918750 on the cap.

    Bailey in front of the knob , Made in the USA behind the knob

    A small ‘U’ casting mark on the frog

    A number 243 on the iron

    Black paint. ‘No 5’ at the back

    Help?

    Like

Leave a comment